 |
Microsoft Dynamics Support
Visit the Microsoft Dynamics newsgroups and exchange ideas with a community of business professionals and product experts from around the globe.
|
|
|
| Author |
Message |
Hirohito
Guest
|
 Posted: Thu Aug 02, 2007 11:54 pm Post subject: Cool down, please . . . |
 |
|
.. . . and search this newsgroup by keyword 'cyrillic'
br
"Marek" wrote:
| Quote: |
Hello
I have problem and I need Help:
1. Axapta using English Language in all system
2. I need write something in Russian Language. When I use Russian Keyboard
and I wriet
somethings in Axapta fields is ok, but after this Russian words was change
and I see only symbol
likely this ??????? (query)
3. In MS SQL database in the fields I see words likely this symbol ???????
(query)
Please send my all information how I can write something in different
Languages in this same
Axapta - I need write simultaneously in 2 Languages.
Please send answer on ma email: search1234@wp.pl
Thank You
Mark |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
IMRTD
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Sep 06, 2007 4:48 pm Post subject: RE: 6820.3 Set up multiple AOS instances |
|
|
This issue has been resolved in AX4.0 with SP1.
--
"pierre.louis" wrote:
| Quote: |
I would think that it is related to the profile of the account that starts the AOS instance.
I use different accounts ( with different settings in profile) to start up the different instances.
But , would using multiple AOS instances not also mean we need more AOS licenses ? !
technet.navision.com Posting date: Wednesday, November 26, 2003
technet.navision.com Posting path: Navision Axapta/Country Issues |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
MTO
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 16, 2008 1:04 am Post subject: RE: GDPDU Examples / Beispiel |
|
|
I search for an Example of the definition group too. Somebody know an example?
"[GBD] B. Welk" wrote:
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
Mike Falkner
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2008 8:34 am Post subject: RE: 11275.1 Check layout |
|
|
Hi Robin,
Banks have basic check layout standards that they need to follow (MICR
position, signature lines, etc) but customer have a lot of freedom on how a
check works.
You can buy many different formats from banks or separate check companies
like Deluxe. So, in most cases, the customer will end up customizing the
check layout to fit the check that they purchase.
sorry about the delay. We're making more passes through the database to make
sure this doesn't happen again!
Mike
"RobinW" wrote:
| Quote: |
I am wondering if all checks in the USA have the same layout. and if Axapta fills these pre printed checks correctly. Is the Citibank check layout compatible with the Axapta standard, and and special settings neccesary?
I am Dutch and have never seen an American check hence m question
TIA
technet.navision.com Posting date: Monday, November 01, 2004
technet.navision.com Posting path: Navision Axapta/Country Issues/Netherlands |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
Mike Falkner
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2008 8:37 am Post subject: RE: 8284.1 MSDS Documents (material safety documentation for |
|
|
obviously too late for the prospect call but we're doing some cleanup.
there isn't a native MSDS app in AX, although the Life Sciences module may
have it. this would probably be a third party app or custom partner solution.
"jmarkell" wrote:
| Quote: |
Does anyone know of an MSDS application or formatted document templates for Axapata? I have a prospect, and "we can do customization" is not an acceptable solution. Thanks.
James Markell
technet.navision.com Posting date: Saturday, October 18, 2003
technet.navision.com Posting path: Navision Axapta/Country Issues/USA |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
Con
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2008 4:13 pm Post subject: RE: AWV report to German bundesbank |
|
|
Hi Birgit,
thank you for entering this suggestion.
The forms Z1, Z5, Z5a are currently not supported by AX.
There are no plans right now to implement them into the product.
"Birgit S. Kern" wrote:
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Con
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2008 4:47 pm Post subject: RE: Fehler bei Installation Kostenrechnung Plus mit Axapta S |
|
|
Hi Irmgard,
given the timeframe that has been gone I assume that this is not an issue
any more. Please apologize for this.
Thanks!
"irmgard" wrote:
| Quote: |
Ich habe derzeit folgende Komponenten installiert:
Microsoft Business solution Axapta 3.0 Build #1951.4060/514-320 SP4/opo23-196
containing DIS und DIP Layer for WEMEA (SP4) und
Kostenrechnung Plus Version 1.5.4 Release zu AX30/sp2 01.10.2003
Beim Versuch die Menüpunkte "Kostenart" und "Leistungsart" aufzurufen stürzt
Axapta ab. Die verbindung zum Sachontenmodul kann nicht hergestellt werden.
Faulting application ax32.exe, version 3.0.1951.4060, stamp 41dbb317,
faulting module ax32.exe, version 3.0.1951.4060, stamp 41dbb317, debug? 0,
fault address 0x001e1793.
Gibt es eine aktuellere Version von Kostenrechnung Plus, die mit SP4
fehlerfrei läuft?
Oder woran kann dieser Fehler liegen?
Feue mich auf jeden Hinweis.
Irmgard
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
An - Microsoft GDL BE
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2008 4:26 pm Post subject: RE: total of received orders to be declared in Prodcom |
|
|
Hi Ann-Sofie
I'm very sorry for the late reply. I don't know this is still an open issue
for you?
Regarding PRODCOM: they are talking about changing the declaration
procedures and forms. We are following this closely and I will take your
suggestion into consideration.
Best regards
AN
"Ann-Sofie" wrote:
| Quote: |
The amount of the received orders has to be declared for PRODCOM (Belgian
functionality)
This amount is (for form 6) printed on the general page under code 13 and 14.
It is a general amount, that should not be given per prodcom code.
Now we have to specify this amount manually on tabpage 'Other' of the
Prodcom declaration (Basic, Periodic, Foreign Trade, Prodcom).
This means that the user has to search the total amount of received orders
himself, and fill it out.
The customer however expects that Axapta calculates and prints this amount
on the declaration, as in fact this is a legal requirement.
----------------
This post is a suggestion for Microsoft, and Microsoft responds to the
suggestions with the most votes. To vote for this suggestion, click the "I
Agree" button in the message pane. If you do not see the button, follow this
link to open the suggestion in the Microsoft Web-based Newsreader and then
click "I Agree" in the message pane.
http://www.microsoft.com/Businesssolutions/Community/NewsGroups/dgbrowser/en-us/default.mspx?mid=9d5326f9-2f25-413c-a447-610e30de59ea&dg=microsoft.public.axapta.localization |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
An - Microsoft GDL BE
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2008 4:42 pm Post subject: RE: legal document for posted & paid fees |
|
|
Hi
I'm very sorry for the late reply on your suggestion.
The yearly declaration of 281.* fiche) to the Belgian governement is on our
list of priorities. I hope to have it soon on our planning.
best regards
AN
"DDD" wrote:
| Quote: |
Hello,
both in Belgium and in France accounting has to provide a report stating a
detail of all fees and commission fees posted to ledger for lawyers,
solicitors, doctors, architects, commissionars, etc
In Belgium the report two reports called "fiche 281.50" and "opgave 325.50"
are needed, of which the first one consists of an individual sheet per person
to whom fees have been paid, the second provides an overview of all
individual sheets.
A link must be made with the accounting transactions for the ledgeraccounts
where the fees have been posted / charged to.
In France only PAID fees may be included in this report;
Please note that this is a legally required document for any accounting
system and has nothing to do with the calculation of salaries for workers and
employees, thus this document cannot be provided by the organisation doing
those calculations
--
Dennis
----------------
This post is a suggestion for Microsoft, and Microsoft responds to the
suggestions with the most votes. To vote for this suggestion, click the "I
Agree" button in the message pane. If you do not see the button, follow this
link to open the suggestion in the Microsoft Web-based Newsreader and then
click "I Agree" in the message pane.
http://www.microsoft.com/Businesssolutions/Community/NewsGroups/dgbrowser/en-us/default.mspx?mid=b087a1b3-4174-4894-9947-ed7d79f7efab&dg=microsoft.public.axapta.localization |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Ivana
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Jan 25, 2008 4:17 pm Post subject: RE: Italian VAT reporting codes |
|
|
"Ingvild" wrote:
| Quote: |
Does someone here have an overviewof the VAT reporting codes used to set up
the Italian sales tax report? Preferably in English, but Italian also works
fine.
|
Hi Ingvild,
I see that your request is 2006!
Fisrt of all do you still need this information? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
Ivana
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Jan 25, 2008 5:07 pm Post subject: RE: Inventory Closing |
|
|
"Ale" wrote:
| Quote: |
Is there some italian people that know which is the fiscal report for
inventory closing?
Thank you
|
Hi Ale,
here the path:
inventory management/journals/fiscal lifo |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
Ivana
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Jan 25, 2008 5:08 pm Post subject: RE: BOE drawing split per due date with posting on Posting D |
|
|
Hi Gianluca,
I don't understand the point 3.
Can you please explain again?
Is the wrong date the Posting date or Due date?
Ivana
"Gianluca" wrote:
| Quote: |
Hi, I am using Italian Localization for Axapta 3.0 SP5.
What I need Axapta to do is this:
1 I choose a Method of Payment BOE (for the customer invoices) with the
Parameter "Date", with the extent to split the BOE to be drawn per Due Date.
2 Using from the "Drawing Bills of Exchange Journal" the functionality of
"Payment Proposal --> Proposal by Due Date", then inserting a Posting Date
and checking the parameter "Future Due Dates", Axapta selects the invoice
transaction and group them per Due Date. This is done correctly in Axapta.
3 The problem is that in the jounal the Posting Date it propose is equal to
the Due Date, instead the Posting Date to be proposed should be the Postin
Date I selected in the "Proposal By Due Date" process.
----------------
This post is a suggestion for Microsoft, and Microsoft responds to the
suggestions with the most votes. To vote for this suggestion, click the "I
Agree" button in the message pane. If you do not see the button, follow this
link to open the suggestion in the Microsoft Web-based Newsreader and then
click "I Agree" in the message pane.
http://www.microsoft.com/Businesssolutions/Community/NewsGroups/dgbrowser/en-us/default.mspx?mid=74b59143-5542-4e0c-943e-88884019892c&dg=microsoft.public.axapta.localization |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
Ivana
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Jan 25, 2008 6:03 pm Post subject: RE: BOE drawing split per due date with posting on Posting D |
|
|
Ciao Gianluca,
ho visto che il problema di cui parli tu è stato risolto.
Apri una chiamata al supporto Microsoft ed i ragazzi ti daranno la soluzione
Ciao
Ivana
"Gianluca" wrote:
| Quote: |
Hi, I am using Italian Localization for Axapta 3.0 SP5.
What I need Axapta to do is this:
1 I choose a Method of Payment BOE (for the customer invoices) with the
Parameter "Date", with the extent to split the BOE to be drawn per Due Date.
2 Using from the "Drawing Bills of Exchange Journal" the functionality of
"Payment Proposal --> Proposal by Due Date", then inserting a Posting Date
and checking the parameter "Future Due Dates", Axapta selects the invoice
transaction and group them per Due Date. This is done correctly in Axapta.
3 The problem is that in the jounal the Posting Date it propose is equal to
the Due Date, instead the Posting Date to be proposed should be the Postin
Date I selected in the "Proposal By Due Date" process.
----------------
This post is a suggestion for Microsoft, and Microsoft responds to the
suggestions with the most votes. To vote for this suggestion, click the "I
Agree" button in the message pane. If you do not see the button, follow this
link to open the suggestion in the Microsoft Web-based Newsreader and then
click "I Agree" in the message pane.
http://www.microsoft.com/Businesssolutions/Community/NewsGroups/dgbrowser/en-us/default.mspx?mid=74b59143-5542-4e0c-943e-88884019892c&dg=microsoft.public.axapta.localization |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
Suzanne Beaudoin
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Jan 25, 2008 9:54 pm Post subject: RE: Reprinting checks feature (Reuse) is only available for |
|
|
Hi,
I am looking into this. I agree that if it in an issue, prioritization set
aside, it should be available for the Cdn cheques as well. Let me
investigate...
Thank you.
--
Suzanne Beaudoin
Manager of Regional Requirements
MICROSOFT BUSINESS SOLUTIONS
Global Development Localization Team
"Finn Johansen" wrote:
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
Bjørn Tollevsen
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon Apr 28, 2008 2:05 pm Post subject: RE: Norwegian sales tax reconciliation report - selection cr |
|
|
This should be fixed in version 4.0.
"Timc",)" wrote:
| Quote: |
ISSUE:
The standard enquiry for selecting records is missing for the Norwegian
sales tax reconciliation report.
IMPACT:
It is not possible to pick out some of accounts.
RESOLUTION:
The user friendliness is declining and the report is missing a powerful
function.
In earlier versions of the report (Dynamics Ax 3.0 SP3 and SP4), the
standard selection was available but it didn’t have effect on account
selection. In SP5 the selection button is erased.
----------------
This post is a suggestion for Microsoft, and Microsoft responds to the
suggestions with the most votes. To vote for this suggestion, click the "I
Agree" button in the message pane. If you do not see the button, follow this
link to open the suggestion in the Microsoft Web-based Newsreader and then
click "I Agree" in the message pane.
http://www.microsoft.com/Businesssolutions/Community/NewsGroups/dgbrowser/en-us/default.mspx?mid=d233020c-c0e0-4212-8117-bbbdcfe6f8f4&dg=microsoft.public.axapta.localization |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
Profile 
Log in to check your private messages | 
FAQ 
Search 
Memberlist 
Usergroups 
Log in
Register
