 |
Microsoft Dynamics Support
Visit the Microsoft Dynamics newsgroups and exchange ideas with a community of business professionals and product experts from around the globe. |
|
|
| Author |
Message |
Larsson Eskil Guest
|
Posted: Fri Jan 25, 2008 10:29 pm Post subject: Max String Character for SQL in SP5 |
|
|
The character used for filling out empty searchfields has been changed from
ASCII 255 to 253., for SQL.
This does not work in Forms like CredPurchaseStat, but works alright in
Qtx'es.
What is the reason for this change. I can't find any documentation on this
change.
/Eskil |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
Hannsjörg Zdarsky (Micro Guest
|
Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 5:54 pm Post subject: RE: Max String Character for SQL in SP5 |
|
|
Hi, Eskil,
the reason for the change is the existence of NULL and NaN values in SQL
databases, which do not exist in the Native database.
If a SQL query performs a comparison against these special values, the
result will be false.
If you think, that the usage of the new maximum characters has not been
implemented correctly throughout the kernel, then I kindly ask you to send
the description with a reproduction scenario to the XAL support, so that the
report gets verified officially.
Thank you very much in advance
Hannsjörg Zdarsky
Software Design Engineer
Microsoft Deutschland GmbH
"Larsson Eskil" wrote:
| Quote: |
The character used for filling out empty searchfields has been changed from
ASCII 255 to 253., for SQL.
This does not work in Forms like CredPurchaseStat, but works alright in
Qtx'es.
What is the reason for this change. I can't find any documentation on this
change.
/Eskil
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
A.Bommersbach Guest
|
Posted: Tue Feb 19, 2008 1:08 pm Post subject: Re: Max String Character for SQL in SP5 |
|
|
Hi,
so that's the reason for some wrong values in reports especially in
accounting. When there is a box where you enter a "centre" and you do
not enter a value for the "to"-field, then all transactions with a
centre given are ignored and the results are wrong. I mean, my own
work-around is to fill the fields with "9999999999" and the results
are the right ones...
Is it better to change the Macro MaxStr to how it was in older
versions to make sure results are right?
Axel |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|